You
can have too little or too much of me. I can hurt you and help you. What am I?
If T.S. Eliot were asked the same riddle, his reply would sound something to
the effect of, “(insert cryptic reference followed by a second baffling
allusion) … Adam’s ale … (insert another mystifying reference just to make it
parallel).” The reader would then have to infer after rereading the passage
twenty times that Eliot meant water. Because so much of Eliot’s writing in The
Wasteland contains references and allusions the audience needs a cipher to
understand, the reader often finds it hard to grasp the underlying themes. Even
when the audience starts to piece together the puzzle, the remaining pieces
seem like round edges trying to fit into rectangular spaces. One instance where
Eliot leaves his readers bewildered exists in the water riddle. Drinking water
sustains life, but drowning causes death. Consuming too little water leads to
dehydration. Nevertheless, water in baptism symbolizes rebirth. Eliot uses
water’s contradictory properties in The Wasteland as a symbol of life and death
in Western civilization during the 20th century.
Eliot
suggests that though the end of winter and the beginning of spring rains
generally produce feelings of life and renewal, spring generates the opposite
response in the people of Western civilization. Eliot writes that April
consists of “dull roots with spring rain” (4). Because people have become
stiffened to life, they essentially act as dull roots. When the rain hits the
roots, they do not absorb any water to grow new flowers. Foregoing their
purpose on earth, the roots contribute nothing to life; they only take up space
and remain subject to nature. Eliot published The Wasteland after World War I,
so society was still recovering from war’s trauma, causing the traumatic events
to harden people. When happiness did come along, it could not touch people
because they were too numb to emotion to recognize the joys of life. Like the
roots refusing to absorb water and fulfill their purpose in life, people
treated their existence as nothing and rejected any meaning Earth or Heaven had
to offer them. Even though Eliot has 20th-century Western civilization in mind,
his observations still apply today. Without a purpose to existence, no reason
exists to seek self-betterment or to further society. People would just be a
bunch of walking, dead roots blind to the renewal and life of spring
rains.
In
the section of the poem titled “Death by Water,” Eliot warns youth to pay
attention to their mortality instead of hopelessly following life’s desires.
Eliot describes the tale of a young man named Phlebas the Phoenician sailor who
died at sea (312-321). When Phlebas died, he entered a whirlpool where “He
passed the stages of his age and youth” (317). This sentence suggests that the
whirlpool represents the constant motion of life. Even though Phlebas drowned
and departed life, his desires continue to drag him around, so he cannot find
satisfaction in death. Phlebas’ death results from water, but the water also
symbolizes Phlebas’ life. Similar to Western civilization’s muddled view of
April rains, the water in this section represents both life and death since
Phlebas foolishly regarded life as insignificant, essentially treating life
like death. Eliot ends “Death by Water” with the lines, “O you who turn the
wheel and look to windward, / Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall
as you” (320-321). The section concludes with a challenge to the youth of the
world. Everyone holds the wheel to his or her own life, free to turn it in any
direction. Although, as Eliot emphasizes, youth and life do not last forever,
so living a meaningful life beats chasing worthless pleasures.
The
most noticeable instance of water prevails in Eliot’s frenzied reiterance of
the contradictory nature of life and death in Western civilization. The theme
develops in the lines, “He who was living is now dead / We who were living are
now dying” (228-229). In both lines, life results in death, providing a bleak
outlook on existence. The hopeless perspective repeats itself in the sentences,
“Here is no water but only rock / Rock and no water and the sandy road”
(331-332). Eliot portrays the lack of water as negative, a sort of destruction
that creates a desolate, dead land. Nevertheless, water’s absence does not
persist; water finally makes an appearance: “In a flash of lightning. Then a
damp gust / Bringing rain” (393-394). Despite water’s representation of death,
water comes like a saving grace to the dry land. Even though the people of
Western civilization considered life worthless, they seemed to cling to life.
Eliot uses the repetition of “Shantih” in the last line of the poem to imply
that no matter how much people seek death and destruction, water and life truly
do bring beauty and meaning. In other words, a meaningful life results in the
peace that passes all understanding.
Eliot
speaks directly to 20th-century civilization, but all of his observations
pertain to the current generation as well. Individuals in today’s society walk
around like zombies thirsting after their own pleasures, leading to an anxious,
unsteady civilization. Eliot frowns upon a Nietzschean perspective that
highlights and emphasizes life’s lack of value. Life does not have to equal
death. By creating a foundation on Christ, one can base existence on a solid
structure and fill life’s void, being born again through water in Christ and
experiencing eternal life in Heaven. Philippians 4:7 sums up Eliot’s point:
“And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts
and minds through Christ Jesus” (King James Version).
Gracie, you did a wonderful job discussing how Eliot uses the symbolism of water to describe western culture of his time. I think comparing apathetic people to dead roots clearly illustrates Eliot’s and your point. People do not want absorb what will help them grow and better themselves. I really agree with your conclusion. If we do not have a solid foundation in Christ, we will eventually stumble and fall, even if we thought a foundation of reason was strong. Overall, I think you did a fantastic job at analyzing such a complex work.
ReplyDelete